Vote Blue No Matter Who!

Why should we “Vote Blue No Matter Who!”? First, let’s look at the Democratic Party as a wolf in sheep’s clothing. Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden are essentially the same, and both have equal interest in white supremacy. If we are to truly liberate marginalized communities, we must eliminate these racist forces from our political system.

The “vote blue no matter who” mantra shuts down any serious evaluation of the Democratic candidate. The problem with this philosophy is that it ignores the needs of the constituents. It also makes the campaign more about the opponent than about the candidate. This isn’t an effective strategy, as evidenced by the defeat of Hillary Clinton by Trump in 2016.

Democratic Party is a wolf in sheep’s clothing

The Democratic Party is a wolf in sheeps’ clothing. Their agenda is based on the ideology of New Deal liberalism, which seeks to consolidate power in Washington. But this centralization drains power from ordinary people, so their policies are a wolf in sheep’s clothing.

Since the primaries, the Democratic field has gone from being lupine to ovine. They are divided and without a coherent agenda, but they abhor Trump, so they embrace Biden. The Democratic field is a wolf in sheep’s clothing in that it has come to define itself by what it is not: Sanders.

Disappointment with Hillary Clinton

For many voters, the slogan “Vote Blue No Matter Who” is a slap in the face. Many intelligent people do not approve of Hillary Clinton and would vote for a Republican instead. They would even vote for Donald Trump before Joe Biden or Elizabeth Warren. They would support someone who has values they share and is not a shill for the Democratic Party.

Hillary Clinton is shamelessly arrogant, egomaniacal, and elitist. Her ambition to win the Presidential nomination is comparable to that of Gollum in Lord of the Rings. While she has several good ideas to make the country a better place, she lacks the philosophical reach of Obama and his rhetorical power. In the end, her authority lies in her commitment to policy and politics, not in her personality.

While Trump’s supporters are supposed to be stupid when it comes to foreign policy, they understand that Chelsea Clinton fought in the stupid war in Iraq. Likewise, Hillary Clinton has never apologized for supporting George W. Bush, and she even embraced him at the funeral of Nancy Reagan.

The fact that Hillary Clinton lost the election despite the fact that Bernie Sanders won by more than 50% of Democratic voters suggests that many of these voters had little sympathy for the former secretary of state. However, they did show a clear disdain for Hillary Clinton, and this fact has been a reason for many of them to abandon the Democratic Party altogether.

The polling results show that the reasons for support for Trump and Clinton are different. A majority of Clinton supporters cite their preference for their party’s nominee, while nearly half of Trump supporters cite their dislike for Trump based on his lack of previous government experience.

Tim Kaine’s anti-abortion stance

If you’re a woman who has had an abortion, you may be concerned about U.S. Sen. Tim Kaine’s anti-abortion stance. The Democrat is the sponsor of the Women’s Health Protection Act, a bill that requires women to get an ultrasound before an abortion. Kaine said in 2008 that his bill would give women accurate and complete information about the procedure. However, a recent study from the Guttmacher Institute, a pro-life research group, found that many states are providing women with incomplete and inaccurate information about the procedure.

Abortion rights advocates are frustrated with Clinton’s decision to pick Kaine. Reproductive rights activists are fighting against the stigma surrounding abortion and are concerned that Kaine will further erode women’s rights. But Kaine has made progress on this issue over the past several years, and his selection could represent a shift to the center for Clinton and her party.

Although Kaine has expressed personal reservations about abortion, his record as a U.S. Senator has been 100% pro-choice. He has voted against dangerous bans on abortion and against attempts to defund Planned Parenthood. He has also supported strong legislation that would provide security at abortion clinics. Additionally, he co-sponsored the Women’s Health Protection Act, which provides federal guarantees that women can access abortion care regardless of their zip code.

Kaine’s anti-abortion record has also led to his criticism from pro-life groups. In 2007, NARAL Pro-Choice America gave Virginia an “F” on a NARAL scorecard for restrictions on abortion. His decision to approve the sale of personalized “Choose Life” license plates infuriated abortion rights groups. However, he argued that he was simply defending free speech.

Howard Dean’s Iraq War platform

The Democratic presidential candidates refocused on the war in Iraq after the arrest of Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein. But while the war has brought some benefits to the Iraqi people, Dean argues that the world faces greater dangers if an Islamist regime is allowed to take over the country.

Dean attacked the Democratic establishment and questioned its support for unilateral military intervention in Iraq. The popular Vermont governor, from the “Democratic wing” of the Democratic Party, was direct in his criticisms of his own party and the Bush administration. However, he lacked specific policy proposals that would help balance the budget.

The campaign generated a significant social network. Nearly seventy percent of Dean activists met someone during the campaign, and 45% of them remain in touch with that person. Many of them were drawn to the campaign by the issues and politics it raised. Many are also loyal to the Democratic Party, but are dissatisfied with the direction it is taking.

Dean supporters favored keeping troops in Iraq until the situation stabilizes. But they also wanted a balanced budget and health care reforms. And they also wanted to see fiscal responsibility, a platform Dean championed as Vermont governor. These are the two most important issues in the Democratic Party today.

But President Bush knowingly misled and distorted American citizens about the facts surrounding the war. Many Americans are still uneasy with the notion that their president would deliberately mislead them. In addition to misinforming the public about the war in Iraq, the administration pinned the blame for Saddam Hussein’s actions on Al Qaeda.